By now, those of us in the geek world are well aware that
Marvel Comics has cancelled their Fantastic Four book. The reasoning for this
seems to be causing a bit of a stir. While the book sales have been low, they
weren't as low as some other books in Marvel's line-up. This has lead many to
speculate that Marvel, under the command of their mouse-eared overlords, are
trying to stick it to Fox, which owns the movies rights to the Fantastic Four.
For those unclear of this whole situation, back in the 90's,
Marvel Comics was in a bad way. Staring down the barrel of bankruptcy, those in
charge began selling the movie rights to some of it's bigger properties such as
Spider-man, the Fantastic Four, Hulk, Ghost Rider, Daredevil, and the X-men.
Why the Avengers were not a part of that sell-off I don't know; perhaps Marvel
wanted to keep a piece of the puzzle for themselves or maybe the Avengers were
just not that popular in the 90's... which they weren't. Seriously, the 90's
were all about the X-men. Granted, if popularity was an issue, then I have no
idea why Namor the Submariner was sold... that guy hasn't been popular since
the 40's!
So fast forward to the present and Marvel is owned by Disney
and making a butt-load of money off of what properties they do possess. While
they have gotten back some of their character's movie rights, there are three
major successful holdouts. Sony still possesses Spider-man (though there have
been rumors that they have been negotiating with Disney to have the Webslinger
cross over into the Marvel film universe... I hope that's true) and Fox still
owns the rights to both the X-men and the Fantastic Four. Thanks to the success
of the sort-of reboot Days of Future Past film from this past summer, the X-men
don't seem to be leaving Fox anytime soon. However, the Fantastic Four is
another story entirely.
Fox has been down the Fantastic Four movie road before,
making two movies in the past decade that... well... sucked. They weren't
without their plusses (as I have mentioned before, Michael Chiklis and Chris
Evans were great as Thing and Human Torch), but compared to other comic book
movies of the time (X-men 2, Batman Begins, Spider-man 2) they were definitely
subpar. Now Fox is trying again for a reboot, this time creating the assumption
that failure will bring with it their surrender of the film rights back to
Marvel. Marvel of course wants this as the Fantastic Four are one of their
biggest franchises, having driven their success by bridging the gap between the
sci-fi popularity of the 50's and the superhero boom of the 60's. Plus, the
Fantastic Four movie rights bring with it characters such as Silver Surfer,
Galactus and Doctor Doom (and maybe the Skrull alien race, Annihilus and
everything Negative Zone related... not sure about those though).
So getting back to my original point, the big rumor is that
Marvel Comics has cancelled their Fantastic Four book to try to stick it to
Fox, as not to advertise for them I guess. However, I have a problem with this
rumor. It doesn't really make sense when you think about it. Comic book movies
tend to bring attention to the comic. Proof of that can be seen in the
resurgence of Iron Man's popularity after the 2008 film, the huge influx of
Avengers books after the movie did phenomenally and the skyrocketed price of
the original Days of Future Past issues from the Uncanny X-Men.
In general, comic books have far less readers than those who
go to the theaters to see their film adaptations. From what I've heard, the
Fantastic Four was recently only selling around 30,000 books a month, not great
numbers. However, unless the rebooted Fantastic Four is a colossal, legendary
flop, they are bound to get more than 30,000 people to buy tickets to see it.
Frankly, I doubt it could flop on that level considering that the 're-imagined'
origins and all around mystery surrounding the film is bound to create some
curiosity from the masses. (That said, I wonder if the curious moviegoers would
largely be comic book fans themselves as the casual viewer, those that really
make or break the success of a subsequent film adaptation, would likely not
care about revamped origins and such.) While the film may be at serious risk of
not making enough of a profit after budget expenses, the movie is more than
likely going to get more viewers than the comic book had buyers. Therefore,
cancelling the Fantastic Four comic book would only really be hurting Marvel. I
mean, they already don't advertise their character movies produced by Sony or
Fox.
Now I am inclined to boycott the new Fantastic Four movie as
I would rather the rights revert to Marvel... a company that I think could
actually make a good adaptation of the franchise. Plus, it seems weird to have
their movie space universe without Silver Surfer or Galactus. However, I do like
the actors Fox and director Josh Trank have chosen for their reboot. I don't
know if I like them as the Fantastic Four characters, but I think Miles Teller,
Kate Mara, Michael B. Jordan and Jamie Bell are all great actors in their own
right. I also thought Trank did a good job directing Chronicle. I don't want
them to fail, but at the same time the reboot sounds dumb (the Fantastic Four
aren't explorers but government weapons?) and I think those involved will be
just fine even if it does flop.
Is there truth to the rumor that Marvel has cancelled the
Fantastic Four as a protest of Fox rebooting the on-screen franchise? Maybe. It
was recently revealed in an interview with Chris Claremont that those writing
the X-Men books are banned from creating new characters as it will give Fox
film rights to those new characters. But Marvel knows better than to cancel
their mutant books as it makes up a large sum of their sales. Perhaps one of
Marvel's higher ups wanted to feel like the company had some power against Fox
and that cancelling the Fantastic Four book might, however small, do some
damage to the reboot and therefore be worth it.
Personally, I think Marvel cancelled the book because of
poor sales and the hope that by creating a buzz around the cancellation, maybe
interest can be rekindled in a property that in recent decades has struggled to
maintain an audience. It worked when they "killed" Johnny Storm a few
years back, so maybe by eliminating the entire team (not killing the characters
mind you, just disbanding the team) they can do their own reboot of the book
and gain a new following. That makes a lot more sense to me than Marvel cutting
off it's nose to spite it's face.
No comments:
Post a Comment