Can everyone just stop and take a deep breath? Okay, Ben
Affleck certainly would not be my top choice to play Batman, but this level of
insanity is a bit much. How can anyone honestly know that Affleck would be
terrible as Batman? Because he made some bad movie choices 10 or 15 years ago?
Because he dated that American Idol
judge? Could Affleck really be a worse Batman than Val Kilmer or George
Clooney? And as I said before, bringing back Christian Bale would make no sense
given how the Dark Knight trilogy
ended. This diatribe here isn’t my declaration of love for all things Ben Affleck.
I just think it’s unfair and kind of ridiculous to chastise a man based on what
he might possibly do rather than what he's done.
The biggest outcry is that “Ben Affleck was terrible in Daredevil!” I actually liked Daredevil. (And yes, that statement got
me laughed at by a sexually ambiguous video rental clerk many years ago.) The
movie wasn’t great and certainly wouldn’t appear anywhere near my Top 10 comic
book movies list, but I was entertained. I certainly didn’t walk out of the
theater proclaiming that Affleck should never be allowed to play a super hero
again! I even own the Director’s cut on DVD (I probably got the movie for $3 on
sale or something). Truthfully, I thought the crappier acting came from
Jennifer Garner as Elektra. I never had a problem with Affleck’s acting in the movie;
personally I think he did the best with what he had to work with. I will
concede, however, that had Colin Farrell not stolen the show as Bullseye, the
movie would not have been as good to me.
But hey, I’m not necessarily an astute critic of acting
unless it really sticks out to me. But even if Affleck did suck as Daredevil,
what makes you think his acting hasn’t improved in the decade since that movie
premiered? I loved him in The Town and
he was good in Argo too. (How can the
actor who starred in last year’s Academy Award winning Best Picture possibly be
so terrible as to not be able to dress like a bat and beat up criminals?) Granted, Affleck did direct those movies, so
maybe he knows how to get the best possible performance from himself… but I
also have enjoyed him in Gus Van Sant’s Good
Will Hunting as well as Kevin Smith’s Chasing
Amy and Jersey Girl (yes, I was
one of the dozen people who saw that one in theaters!). And Jay is certainly a
fan…
I actually wonder how many of the people crying foul on this
casting were the ones proclaiming Man of
Steel to be horrible. Come on, can Batfleck really make something horrible
even worse? Zero times any number is still zero. If you thought Man of Steel
was so bad, would you really entertain going to a sequel by the same
writer/director team?
Plus, whatever ever happened to “wait and see?” What
happened to having an open mind? Since when does a casting decision
automatically equal a bad movie? Sure, I have had reservations about certain
film-making decisions but I am always willing to give it a chance… at least by
watching a trailer or two. I was pretty leery of J.J. Abrams’ take on Star Trek with recasting the original
crew, but I ended up loving that movie! I wasn’t sure about casting the gay
cowboy that was in A Knight’s Tale,
but Heath Ledger was brilliant as the Joker! I wasn’t sold on Chris Evans as
Captain America,
but he was really good too! Just give it a chance, people. If it sucks, then by
all means bitch, moan and shit allover it like a geriatric almost making the
toilet. But going nuts about it before the damn script is even written is just
stupid. Plus, you’re playing into Warner Brothers’ strategy. As the saying goes,
there is no such thing as bad advertising.
All I’m saying is just, give Ben a chance. Let’s allow him
to try on the cape and cowl and give us a barely coherent growling of 'Why do
you want to kill me?' before we send the villagers after him with torches.
No comments:
Post a Comment